Image
October 31, 2024

The New York Times Has Caught on To Kamala’s Record – But not Her Extremism

 

Vice President Kamala Harris’ focused messaging on abortion is where she has seemed most comfortable and at ease. For those who protect preborn lives, it’s deeply disturbing, and her desire to make it the cornerstone issue of her campaign should tell you everything about her candidacy, which has failed and stumbled on the economy, the border, foreign policy, and other domestic issues that voters care about.  

Yet, the media recently gave her kudos for her immoral handling of the human rights issue of our time: abortion.  

In their reporting, The New York Times says, “While some Democrats, including President Biden, have become far more outspoken about abortion rights since the fall of Roe v. Wade, interviews with friends and former associates of Ms. Harris, and a review of her work as a prosecutor, show that she has been publicly passionate about the issue for decades. For a politician who has been criticized for wavering and flipping on some issues, this is one area, former associates say, where her conviction has always been clear.” 

Students for Life Action (SFLAction) wrote in August that this was the only position she hasn’t flip flopped on. In that article, we said, “It’s the one area where Harris has stayed true to her beliefs. An extremist from the beginning, Harris has always argued for limitless and unrestricted abortion – not just at the state level but as a matter of national policy.” 

READ: Kamala Harris’s Record Has Been All Over the Place: Flip Flops Galore and Consistency on Only ONE Issue 

 

What the media won’t say is how extreme that record has been.  

SFLAction wrote about that extensively, saying, “let’s consider that a future Harris administration would be wildly radical and go even further than even Biden.” 

This is partially because the Democrats have never liked Roe v. Wade, and the Harris-Walz campaign wants to codify something worse than Roe into national law, aided by extremists like New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, who would gladly destroy the filibuster to accomplish this. 

For those who have missed our extensive coverage (shame on you), here’s a reminder of what that looks like in practice: 

  • She voted on legislation that would force Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, a view she’s echoed just recently. 
  • She voted to force pregnancy resource centers to cover abortions, a violation of their  purpose and mandate. 

READ: What the Media isn’t Going to Tell You About Kamala Harris’ Record on Abortion 

 

And that’s just what Harris has done as an attorney general, senator, and Vice President. Imagine what she would do with the full power and authority of the Presidency?